Relatives' Distress Over Shoreline Degradation Endangering Norfolk Graves
Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.
A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.
A newly published study on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril
Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.
Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”
The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.