🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to erase African American heritage and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. Denise Miller, a prof at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.